Friday, December 7, 2012

Old man scapegoats cloud:

or, whither our priorities

A friend shared the text/graphic at right on her Facebook timeline, and I had to agree--IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE.

The same national leadership yelling loudest about illegal immigration and foreign aid are the same ones blocking veteran benefits, fighting against more funding for wider health care and prescription drug coverage for seniors, demonizing the hungry in our own country, and on and on.

Their goal is to have the rich pay less per capita than the poor in taxes and distracting the public by making issues like illegal immigration and federal foreign aid the scapegoats for why these other things aren't being funded. (Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.)

$1 TRILLION in revenue has been LOST to the Bush tax cuts on the top 5% of earners between 2001 and 2011. Most of that trillion dollars (seven-tenths) comes from the top 1% of income earners, who make more than $1 million a year. Those lost revenues (given away as two wars began) would wipe out the 2012 budget deficit almost dollar for dollar.


Why aren't we able to outfit our men and women in uniform properly? F-22 Raptor fighter jets cost $150,000,000 each to make (with development costs included, the number swells to $350 million).

Twelve new planes = fully equipping between 100,000 and 240,000 soldiers for a year.

This year, a secret hold was put on a 1.9% cost-of-living increase in disability benefits for veterans and surviving spouses proposal in the Senate by an unnamed Republican. That extra $500 per year per veteran ($686 million total in fiscal 2013) equates to four F-22s that the military doesn't even want. (That COLA increase was finally passed and signed into law last week).

In 2009, Air Force leaders had already said they didn't want any more F-22s because of the plane's limited air-to-ground capabilities needed for today's battlefields. While the whole Congress opted to end production of F-22 Raptor fighter jets, the House Armed Services committee stripped money from another program budgeted for 2010 to order 12 new F-22s. That the Air Force DIDN'T WANT. Presidential candidate Mitt Romney said during his campaign that he "would also add F-22s to our air force fleet," after F-22 production finally ended this year.


Curious about where that federal foreign aid (1.5% of the federal budget) goes?

In 2010, the total budgeted amount of federal foreign assistance was $38 billion. The top 5 recipients in order were

  1. Afghanistan
  2. Pakistan
  3. Israel
  4. Iraq
  5. Egypt
Those 5 accounted for more than half of the total help that the US offers the entire world. Two of those top 5 - Afghanistan and Iraq - need our help because our military sorties there have obliterated their infrastructures. Pakistan is being assisted for its help with our objectives there. The cost of the 12 unnecessary (according to the Air Force itself) F-22s the House Armed Services Committee ordered up pays for the foreign aid of the top 5 countries listed there.


The federal tax/cost deficit created by undocumented households (yes, undocumented workers *do* contribute to federal coffers) was $29 billion for 2011. That equates to 1/10th of 1% of the federal budget in 2011.

By comparison, we spend $52 billion - almost twice that tax/cost deficit - on maintaining the US nuclear weapons program. Estimates put costs at $352 billion minimum over the coming decade to operate and modernize the current US arsenal.

 

Bonus fun facts:

The average nuclear weapon in the US arsenal is approximately eight times more powerful than the nuclear bomb that destroyed Hiroshima, immediately killing some 90,000 people.

At a count of 5,113, we have as many operational* nuclear warheads as the rest of the world COMBINED. When stockpiles and warheads in queue for disarmament are included, the number is something like 19,000).

 

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Where are SD state education "reform" ideas coming from? Meet ALEC

As a South Dakota parent or teacher, would you like to know where our state's education "reform" legislation is coming from? Sen. Todd J. Schlekeway (R-11), Rep. Tad Perry (R-24) and Rep. Jacqueline Sly (R-33) are listed as "Individual Members" of the American Legislative Exchange Council [ALEC]'s 2011 "Education Task Force." The 2011 gathering would have informed this year's session re: bills to be introduced. The US Chamber of Commerce, for example, introduced at the ALEC gathering the "model" bill "Free Enterprise Education Act".

[Thursday, 02 Feb. 2012] Today, hundreds of state legislators from across the nation will head out to an "island" resort on the coast of Florida to a unique "education academy" sponsored by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). There will be no students or teachers. Instead, legislators, representatives from right-wing think tanks and for-profit education corporations will meet behind closed doors to channel their inner Milton Friedman and promote the radical transformation of the American education system into a private, for-profit enterprise.

The non-profit group Fund Education Now intercepted one of ALEC's invitations to legislators in Florida delineating the junket's deluxe (and gratis) accommodations and summarizing the opportunity to learn more about school privatization and giving teachers their comeuppance.

"You are cordially invited to attend ALEC's K-12 Education Reform Academy, February 3-4, 2012 at the Ritz-Carlton in Amelia Island, Florida. For invited legislators like you, ALEC will cover your room for up to two nights at the host hotel. ALEC will also reimburse up to $500 for travel expenses, which includes coach airfare, cabfare, and a reimbursement of 55.5 cents per mile driven."

"This event will address the top reforms in K-12 education that ALEC believes each state must have to ensure the successful and productive education for all American students. We will discuss what you as a state legislator can do to address a variety of issues surrounding K-12 education reform, including charter schools accessibility, accountability and transparency, standards for teacher excellence, open enrollment, vouchers, tax credits, and blended learning options."

Fund Education Now co-founder Kathleen Oropeza says the "academy" is closed to the press and the public and Amelia Island itself is secluded from the outside world and heavily policed. The meeting's agenda is so secretive that Oropeza has been unable to track one down.

"The island is a challenge for protestors, and we think they chose it for that reason," Oropeza says.

However, a raft of ALEC legislative and corporate members are certain to be there. These include online school businesses such as K-12 Inc., Insight Schools, and Connections Academy a division of Connections Education LLC. These for-profit schools will likely join with their allies from the Heritage Foundation, Texas Public Policy Center, The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, the Hoover Institution, the Alliance for School Choice and more.
[Dustin Beilke, PR Watch]

To begin understanding how the American Legislative Exchange Council and its corporate-led agenda can affect education in South Dakota, start at this article. Follow your outrage from there.


...